lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 21:45:25 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] nohz: Enforce timekeeping on CPU 0 On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 02:46:56PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > People think all sorts of things. And it becomes very irritating when > thoughtful assumptions get burned into ROM for example. We should be > able to do better in the kernel. Agreed. There used to be an x86 subarch where the boot cpu wasn't cpu0, that always gave a lot of 'joy' too :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists