[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140719194525.GT9918@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 21:45:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] nohz: Enforce timekeeping on CPU 0
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 02:46:56PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> People think all sorts of things. And it becomes very irritating when
> thoughtful assumptions get burned into ROM for example. We should be
> able to do better in the kernel.
Agreed. There used to be an x86 subarch where the boot cpu wasn't cpu0,
that always gave a lot of 'joy' too :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists