| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <53CADAAE.1030509@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 21:53:02 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:ad7280a: Use managed interfaces
On 19/07/14 21:46, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2014, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
>> On 19/07/14 11:33, Himangi Saraogi wrote:
>>> This patch moves data allocated using unmanaged interfaces to managed
>>> interfaces like devm_kzalloc, devm_iio_device_register, devm_kasprintf,
>>> devm_request_threaded_irq and does away with the calls to free the
>>> allocated memory in the probe and remove functions. Some labels in the
>>> probe function are also removed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>
>> cc'ing Lars who tends to look after Analog Devices drivers
>> and more specifically was involved in the thread that lead to this
>> patch.
>>
>> Also, the devm_kasprintf does not appear to be in upstream so this
>> patch should have made an dependency clear.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/16/667
>>
>> What is the intended merge path for that patch?
>
> Greg said that he would be taking it. He already took the devm_kasprintf
> patch.
Cool. That's fine (and now you mention it - he did say that in the thread
I just forgot). Still, it did want mentioning in the description for this
patch as well.
>
> julia
>
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>> I am not very sure if devmifying request_irq is a good idea as it
>>> leads to the freeing of the interrupt after the ad7280_write.
>> Agreed. I wouldn't do it!
>>
>> Otherwise, all looks fine.
>>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c | 57
>>> ++++++++++++++-------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
>>> b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
>>> index d215edf..3706b3e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c
>>> @@ -486,8 +486,8 @@ static int ad7280_channel_init(struct ad7280_state *st)
>>> {
>>> int dev, ch, cnt;
>>>
>>> - st->channels = kcalloc((st->slave_num + 1) * 12 + 2,
>>> - sizeof(*st->channels), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + st->channels = devm_kcalloc(&st->spi->dev, (st->slave_num + 1) * 12 +
>>> 2,
>>> + sizeof(*st->channels), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (st->channels == NULL)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> @@ -547,8 +547,9 @@ static int ad7280_attr_init(struct ad7280_state *st)
>>> {
>>> int dev, ch, cnt;
>>>
>>> - st->iio_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*st->iio_attr) * (st->slave_num + 1) *
>>> - AD7280A_CELLS_PER_DEV * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + st->iio_attr = devm_kzalloc(&st->spi->dev, sizeof(*st->iio_attr) *
>>> + (st->slave_num + 1) *
>>> + AD7280A_CELLS_PER_DEV * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (st->iio_attr == NULL)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> @@ -564,7 +565,7 @@ static int ad7280_attr_init(struct ad7280_state *st)
>>> st->iio_attr[cnt].dev_attr.store =
>>> ad7280_store_balance_sw;
>>> st->iio_attr[cnt].dev_attr.attr.name =
>>> - kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
>>> + devm_kasprintf(&st->spi->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>>> "in%d-in%d_balance_switch_en",
>>> (dev * AD7280A_CELLS_PER_DEV) + ch,
>>> (dev * AD7280A_CELLS_PER_DEV) + ch +
>>> 1);
>>> @@ -581,7 +582,8 @@ static int ad7280_attr_init(struct ad7280_state *st)
>>> st->iio_attr[cnt].dev_attr.store =
>>> ad7280_store_balance_timer;
>>> st->iio_attr[cnt].dev_attr.attr.name =
>>> - kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
>>> "in%d-in%d_balance_timer",
>>> + devm_kasprintf(&st->spi->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>>> + "in%d-in%d_balance_timer",
>>> (dev * AD7280A_CELLS_PER_DEV) + ch,
>>> (dev * AD7280A_CELLS_PER_DEV) + ch +
>>> 1);
>>> ad7280_attributes[cnt] =
>>> @@ -900,48 +902,36 @@ static int ad7280_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>>>
>>> ret = ad7280_attr_init(st);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> - goto error_free_channels;
>>> + return ret;
>>>
>>> - ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
>>> + ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
>>> if (ret)
>>> - goto error_free_attr;
>>> + return ret;
>>>
>>> if (spi->irq > 0) {
>>> ret = ad7280_write(st, AD7280A_DEVADDR_MASTER,
>>> AD7280A_ALERT, 1,
>>> AD7280A_ALERT_RELAY_SIG_CHAIN_DOWN);
>>> if (ret)
>>> - goto error_unregister;
>>> + return ret;
>>>
>>> ret = ad7280_write(st, AD7280A_DEVADDR(st->slave_num),
>>> AD7280A_ALERT, 0,
>>> AD7280A_ALERT_GEN_STATIC_HIGH |
>>> (pdata->chain_last_alert_ignore & 0xF));
>>> if (ret)
>>> - goto error_unregister;
>>> -
>>> - ret = request_threaded_irq(spi->irq,
>>> - NULL,
>>> - ad7280_event_handler,
>>> - IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
>>> - IRQF_ONESHOT,
>>> - indio_dev->name,
>>> - indio_dev);
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&spi->dev, spi->irq, NULL,
>>> + ad7280_event_handler,
>>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
>>> + IRQF_ONESHOT, indio_dev->name,
>>> + indio_dev);
>>> if (ret)
>>> - goto error_unregister;
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> -error_unregister:
>>> - iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>>> -
>>> -error_free_attr:
>>> - kfree(st->iio_attr);
>>> -
>>> -error_free_channels:
>>> - kfree(st->channels);
>>> -
>>> - return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int ad7280_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>>> @@ -949,16 +939,9 @@ static int ad7280_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>>> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>>> struct ad7280_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>
>>> - if (spi->irq > 0)
>>> - free_irq(spi->irq, indio_dev);
>>> - iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>>> -
>>> ad7280_write(st, AD7280A_DEVADDR_MASTER, AD7280A_CONTROL_HB, 1,
>>> AD7280A_CTRL_HB_PWRDN_SW | st->ctrl_hb);
>>>
>>> - kfree(st->channels);
>>> - kfree(st->iio_attr);
>>> -
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists