lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140720192315.GA4679@ravnborg.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:23:15 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Kbuild: Add a option to enable dwarf4 On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:16:12AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> > > I found that a lot of unresolvable variables when using gdb on the kernel > become resolvable when dwarf4 is enabled. So add a Kconfig flag to enable it. > > It definitely increases the debug information size, but on the other > hand this isn't so bad when debug fusion is used. Would it not make sense to try to enable degug info like this: First try -gdwarf-4 If this fails try -gdwarf-3 If this fails try -gdwarf-2 And if this also fails fallback to -g We could then us a Kconfig option to enable the highest debug level - where 4 for now is the highest. On the other hand if most people have revent utils then they all have -gdwarf-4 supported and then it is no big deal. Sam > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> > --- > Makefile | 3 +++ > lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 953659e..9c4080b 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -690,6 +690,9 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += -g > KBUILD_AFLAGS += -Wa,-gdwarf-2 > endif > endif > +ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4 > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -gdwarf-4 > +endif Should we sue $(call cc-option ...) here as not all gcc's supports this today? Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists