lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1405840786.6512.55.camel@marge.simpson.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:19:46 +0200 From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 143e1e28 sched: Rework sched_domain topology definition On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 09:05 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 08:52 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 08:43:36AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > +/* > > > + * Topology list, bottom-up. > > > + */ > > > +static struct sched_domain_topology_level default_topology[] = { > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT > > > + { cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) }, > > > +#endif > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC > > > + { cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) }, > > > +#endif > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_BOOK > > > + { cpu_book_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(BOOK) }, > > > +#endif > > > + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) }, > > > + { NULL, }, > > > +}; > > > > > > Why did this commit rename the CPU domain to DIE? > > > > Because they're both wrong, but we found that DIE was less wrong than > > CPU. > > Ok, doesn't matter anyway, just looks peculiar. > > > Seeing how CPU typically means 1 logical, well, CPU, in the scheduler, > > and not the package you stick on your board. > > > > We chose DIE over PACKAGE due to 1) its shorter name and 2) things like > > interlagos which have multiple DIEs in one PACKAGE etc.. > > It's actually a good name for some NUMA topologies. You don't ever want > to see a CPU domain, that sucks cycles, so calling it DIE is fine :) Like this 8 socket box. CPU domain with weight 64 stings. vogelweide:~/:[0]# tune-sched-domains usage: tune-sched-domains <val> {cpu0/domain0:MC} SD flag: 559 + 1: SD_LOAD_BALANCE: Do load balancing on this domain + 2: SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE: Balance when about to become idle + 4: SD_BALANCE_EXEC: Balance on exec + 8: SD_BALANCE_FORK: Balance on fork, clone - 16: SD_BALANCE_WAKE: Wake to idle CPU on task wakeup + 32: SD_WAKE_AFFINE: Wake task to waking CPU - 64: SD_PREFER_LOCAL: Prefer to keep tasks local to this domain - 128: SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER: Domain members share cpu power - 256: SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE: Balance for power savings + 512: SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES: Domain members share cpu pkg resources -1024: SD_SERIALIZE: Only a single load balancing instance -2048: SD_ASYM_PACKING: Place busy groups earlier in the domain -4096: SD_PREFER_SIBLING: Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain -8192: SD_PREFER_UTILIZATION: Prefer utilization over SMP nice {cpu0/domain1:CPU} SD flag: 4143 + 1: SD_LOAD_BALANCE: Do load balancing on this domain + 2: SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE: Balance when about to become idle + 4: SD_BALANCE_EXEC: Balance on exec + 8: SD_BALANCE_FORK: Balance on fork, clone - 16: SD_BALANCE_WAKE: Wake to idle CPU on task wakeup + 32: SD_WAKE_AFFINE: Wake task to waking CPU - 64: SD_PREFER_LOCAL: Prefer to keep tasks local to this domain - 128: SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER: Domain members share cpu power - 256: SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE: Balance for power savings - 512: SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES: Domain members share cpu pkg resources -1024: SD_SERIALIZE: Only a single load balancing instance -2048: SD_ASYM_PACKING: Place busy groups earlier in the domain +4096: SD_PREFER_SIBLING: Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain -8192: SD_PREFER_UTILIZATION: Prefer utilization over SMP nice -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists