[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN_we7Nuze_8tWqADGrhpeCtixssTzqf_wOZAYuAg+sv8nHJYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:19:56 +0200
From: Daniele Forsi <dforsi@...il.com>
To: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb:serial:pl2303: add GPIOs interface on PL2303
2014-07-20 8:38 GMT+02:00 Wang YanQing:
> PL2303HX has two GPIOs, this patch add interface for it.
checkpatch.pl shows 2 errors:
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
#218: FILE: drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c:309:
+ if(pl2303_vendor_read(gpio->serial, 0x0081, buf) < 1)
ERROR: that open brace { should be on the previous line
#248: FILE: drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c:381:
+ if (type == TYPE_HX)
+ {
it also shows 3 warnings
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_PL2303_GPIO
> +struct pl2303_gpio {
> + /*
> + * 0..3: unknown (zero)
> + * 4: gp0 output enable (1: gp0 pin is output, 0: gp0 pin is input)
> + * 5: gp1 output enable (1: gp1 pin is output, 0: gp1 pin is input)
> + * 6: gp0 pin value
> + * 7: gp1 pin value
> + */
> + u8 index;
> + struct usb_serial *serial;
> + struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
> +};
> +#endif
it would be nice to state what happens if you read pin 6 and 7 when
they are set for output
> @@ -262,6 +377,37 @@ static int pl2303_startup(struct usb_serial *serial)
> + gpio->gpio_chip.ngpio = 2;
you set ngpio but you don't use it
you would save some code if each function that use "index" has
if (index >= gpio->gpio_chip.ngpio)
return -EINVAL;
and then read the constants from 2 arrays in file scope:
gpio_index_mask = {0x10, 0x20};
gpio_value_mask = {0x40, 0x80};
so you can change this:
> + if (offset == 0) {
> + gpio->index |= 0x10;
> + if (value)
> + gpio->index |= 0x40;
> + else
> + gpio->index &= ~0x40;
> + } else if (offset == 1) {
> + gpio->index |= 0x20;
> + if (value)
> + gpio->index |= 0x80;
> + else
> + gpio->index &= ~0x80;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
to this:
if (index >= gpio->gpio_chip.ngpio)
return -EINVAL;
gpio->index |= gpio_index_mask[offset];
if (value)
gpio->index |= gpio_value_mask[offset];
else
gpio->index &= ~gpio_value_mask[offset];
do you find it less readable or less efficient?
--
Daniele Forsi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists