[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E0BE1322F2F2246BD820DA9FC397ADE016FC1D7@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 06:11:19 +0000
From: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 07/10] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound
violation information
On 2014-07-21, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com> writes:
>> + */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> + insn->x86_64 = 1;
>> + insn->addr_bytes = 8;
>> +#else
>> + insn->x86_64 = 0;
>> + insn->addr_bytes = 4;
>> +#endif
>
> How would that handle compat mode on a 64bit kernel?
> Should likely look at the code segment instead of ifdef.
>> + /* Note: the upper 32 bits are ignored in 32-bit mode. */
>
> Again correct for compat mode? I believe the upper bits are undefined.
>
Compat mode will be supported on next patch in future, as 0/ patch mentioned. ^-^
Thanks,
Qiaowei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists