lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:19:31 +0100 From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com> To: Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> CC: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>, <markos.chandras@...tec.com>, <Steven.Hill@...tec.com>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: Remove uneeded line in cmp_smp_finish On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 05:33:16PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote: > > On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 01:10 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote: > >> This patch removes a unneeded line from this file as stated by the > >> fix me in this file. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> > >> --- > >> arch/mips/kernel/smp-cmp.c | 2 -- > >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/smp-cmp.c b/arch/mips/kernel/smp-cmp.c > >> index fc8a515..61bfa20 100644 > >> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/smp-cmp.c > >> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/smp-cmp.c > >> @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ static void cmp_smp_finish(void) > >> { > >> pr_debug("SMPCMP: CPU%d: %s\n", smp_processor_id(), __func__); > >> > >> - /* CDFIXME: remove this? */ > >> - write_c0_compare(read_c0_count() + (8 * mips_hpt_frequency / HZ)); > > > > That comment ends in a question mark. I wonder why... > > > >> #ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_FPAFF > >> /* If we have an FPU, enroll ourselves in the FPU-full mask */ > > > > > > Paul Bolle > > > If we need it then can I remove the FIx me comment. > Cheers Nick That depends: have you verified that we do need it? I wouldn't feel comfortable with removing either line without someone first explaining why it isn't necessary and testing the result on a number of different systems, with varying combinations of csrc-r4k & cevt-r4k. I absolutely agree that removing unnecessary code or outdated comments are both good things, but let's be sure they're unnecessary or outdated first. Your patch does not make me confident that you've checked either of those. Thanks, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists