lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:44:01 +0000 From: "Yue Zhang (OSTC DEV)" <yuezha@...rosoft.com> To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>, "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, Thomas Shao <huishao@...rosoft.com>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Hyperv: Trigger DHCP renew after host hibernation > From: Richard Weinberger [mailto:richard@....at] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 4:18 PM > > Yue, > > Am 21.07.2014 10:05, schrieb Yue Zhang (OSTC DEV): > > The problem of systemd implementation is that in different distros, the ways > > to restart service are different. Propagating the event to userspace also doesn't > > help for this issue. > > This way each distro can provide their own restart script. > Same as every distro has custom start scripts, etc... > > > The advantage of current solution is that it simulates a cable plugging > > in/out event. IMHO, in all the distros, this simulated event has already been well > > handled. It is a dup effect to implement new hooks. > > Iff the current solution works for _all_ networking implementations. > > Thanks, > //richard Hi, Richard IMHO, all networking implementations should handle the cable offline event. Consider this situation. I unplugged the network cable and connect it to a new network switch after 10 seconds. If the DHCP renew is not triggered, the network will break. I think in normal cases, it should already been handled properly. Unless there is a strong justification for not doing this. In that case, we shouldn't renew DHCP anyway. Thanks ---- Yue
Powered by blists - more mailing lists