[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140721100135.GB20751@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:01:35 +0200
From: Petr Mládek <pmladek@...e.cz>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kay@...y.org, bp@...e.de,
john.stultz@...aro.org, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] printk: initialize syslog_prev and console_prev
On Fri 2014-07-18 16:28:00, Alex Elder wrote:
> Two global variables, "syslog_prev" and "console_prev", maintain a
> copy of the flags value used in the log record most recently
> formatted for syslog or the console, respectively.
>
> Initially there is no previous formatted log record, and these
> variables simply have an initial value 0. And occasionally log
> records can get consumed at a rate such that syslog or the console
> can't keep up, in which case those variables (along with their
> corresponding position variables) must be reset. Here too, they're
> reset to 0.
>
> This patch changes it so the initial value used is LOG_NEWLINE.
> That is, if we know nothing about the prevously-formatted log
> record, we can assume it was complete, and ended with a newline.
>
> This is being done to support the next patch. Initializing
> these variables this way makes LOG_NEWLINE and LOG_CONT be
> mutually exclusive, and the next patch uses that fact to simplify
> some logic.
I have decided to double check it and found more locations where the flags were
reset to 0:
+ "prev" variable in syslog_print_all()
+ "prev" variable in kmsg_dump_get_buffer()
Also I think that we should not reset it to LOG_NEWLINE when the
message is gone. I would suggest to do
&= (LOG_CONT | LOG_NEWLINE);
I mean to preserve the status of the last copied/printed piece. Then
we could put there "\n" when the last proceed piece was continuous and
the next one starts with prefix.
The only exception would be "console_prev" in console_unlock()
because there we already add "\n" in the "** %u printk messages
dropped **" warning.
How does that sound?
Best Regards,
Petr
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mládek <pmladek@...e.cz>
> ---
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index ffc9928..4034a88 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(log_wait);
> /* the next printk record to read by syslog(READ) or /proc/kmsg */
> static u64 syslog_seq;
> static u32 syslog_idx;
> -static enum log_flags syslog_prev;
> +static enum log_flags syslog_prev = LOG_NEWLINE;
> static size_t syslog_partial;
>
> /* index and sequence number of the first record stored in the buffer */
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static u32 log_next_idx;
> /* the next printk record to write to the console */
> static u64 console_seq;
> static u32 console_idx;
> -static enum log_flags console_prev;
> +static enum log_flags console_prev = LOG_NEWLINE;
>
> /* the next printk record to read after the last 'clear' command */
> static u64 clear_seq;
> @@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static int syslog_print(char __user *buf, int size)
> /* messages are gone, move to first one */
> syslog_seq = log_first_seq;
> syslog_idx = log_first_idx;
> - syslog_prev = 0;
> + syslog_prev = LOG_NEWLINE;
> syslog_partial = 0;
> }
> if (syslog_seq == log_next_seq) {
> @@ -1301,7 +1301,7 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, bool from_file)
> /* messages are gone, move to first one */
> syslog_seq = log_first_seq;
> syslog_idx = log_first_idx;
> - syslog_prev = 0;
> + syslog_prev = LOG_NEWLINE;
> syslog_partial = 0;
> }
> if (from_file) {
> @@ -2149,7 +2149,7 @@ again:
> /* messages are gone, move to first one */
> console_seq = log_first_seq;
> console_idx = log_first_idx;
> - console_prev = 0;
> + console_prev = LOG_NEWLINE;
> } else {
> len = 0;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists