[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140721121854.GA111224@ubuntu-hedt>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:18:54 -0500
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
lxc-devel@...ts.linuxcontainers.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
"Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@...tsend.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fuse/dev: Fix unbalanced calls to kunmap_atomic()
during splice I/O
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:21:55PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Seth Forshee
> <seth.forshee@...onical.com> wrote:
> > fuse_copy_finish() assumes that mapaddr in fuse_copy_state refers
> > to a valid mapping if currbuf is non-NULL, but this isn't always
> > true when moving pages for splice I/O. This results in an
> > unbalanced call to kunmap_atomic() and thus an unbalanced
> > decrement of the preempt count. Avoid this by checking that
> > mapaddr is non-NULL before calling kunmap_atomic().
>
> I guess this is obsoleted by:
>
> c55a01d360af fuse: avoid scheduling while atomic
>
> which moves the kmap/kunmap closer to the actual use of the mapping.
>
> Can you please verify?
Yes, that commit does seem to fix the problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists