linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 21/29] nios2: Futex operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFiDJ5_hjBQ4tOpsUdgqgwRrJ1TgFSa9pEqc2m+srMj5Fkir=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:20:02 +0800
From:	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/29] nios2: Futex operations

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2014 11:42:34 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Friday 18 July 2014 14:07:42 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> > If this understanding is right, we can probably just merge the
>> > m68k implementation into the asm-generic version, as that does
>> > exactly that, and just isn't SMP safe. I'm still unsure whether
>> > I'm missing something here though, as everything else seems to
>> > do this in assembly, even for non-SMP machines that could use
>> > the trivial method that m68k has.
>>
>> For UP relying of pagefault disable should be good enough indeed. I
>> guess the asm for the other UP stuff results from looking at
>> architectures or copying from architectures which did this in ASM
>
> Ok, thanks for the confirmation!
>
> Ley Foon Tan, I think the best way forward then is for you to
> take the m68k code and copy (or move) that into asm-generic/futex.h
> under an #ifndef CONFIG_SMP.

Okay, I will copy m68k implementation to asm-generic/futex.h.
Do you prefer this as separate patch submission or this can be part of
nios2 patchset?
Thanks.

Regards
Ley Foon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/