[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1407211833330.3647@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:35:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] (RFC) X86: add IPI tracepoints
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 01:18 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On X86 there are already tracepoints for IRQ vectors through which IPIs
> > are handled. However this is highly X86 specific, and the IPI signaling
> > is not currently traced.
> >
> > This is an attempt at adding generic IPI tracepoints to X86.
>
> I welcome this, and fwiw have been trying out this patch. One thing I
> would like to see, but due to overhead would probably be better suited
> in userspace (trace-cmd, maybe?), is a more packed description of the
> IPI. Ie: unifying ipi_init and ipi_exit and show overall cost of the
> IPI.
That's best suited for the tool consuming the log in user space. The
same is done with IRQ events already.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists