lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:50:28 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <>
To:	Stratos Karafotis <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect

On Monday, June 30, 2014 07:59:32 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Hi all,
> This patchset changes slightly the calculation of target frequency to
> eliminate the deadband effect (explained in patch 2 changelog) that it
> seems to slow down the CPU in low and medium loads.
> Patch 1 introduces a new relation (RELATION_C) for the next frequency
> selection, which chooses the closest frequency to target.
> Patch 2 is the actual change to ondemand governor.
> You may find graphs with the 'deadband' effect and benchmark results:
> Thanks
> Stratos Karafotis (2):
>   cpufreq: Introduce new relation for freq selection
>   cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect in low loads
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 11 +++++++----
>  drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c       | 12 +++++++++++-
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h            |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

OK, I've queued up these two patches for 3.17.  We'll see if anyone sees
any problems related to them.  Thanks!

I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists