[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1513010.lqhBUJhHsL@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:50:28 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect
On Monday, June 30, 2014 07:59:32 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patchset changes slightly the calculation of target frequency to
> eliminate the deadband effect (explained in patch 2 changelog) that it
> seems to slow down the CPU in low and medium loads.
>
> Patch 1 introduces a new relation (RELATION_C) for the next frequency
> selection, which chooses the closest frequency to target.
>
> Patch 2 is the actual change to ondemand governor.
>
> You may find graphs with the 'deadband' effect and benchmark results:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16kDBh5lyc6YvBnoS1hUa1t2O38z0xrWvaEj5XtJ8auw/edit#gid=2072493052
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Stratos Karafotis (2):
> cpufreq: Introduce new relation for freq selection
> cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect in low loads
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 11 +++++++----
> drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
OK, I've queued up these two patches for 3.17. We'll see if anyone sees
any problems related to them. Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists