[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407211747090.7042@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_*(): Always evaluate second argument
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Evaluating a macro argument only if certain configuration options
> have been selected is confusing and error-prone. Hence always
> evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested() and
> spin_lock_nest_lock().
>
> This patch has the intentional side effect that it avoids that the
> following warning is reported for netif_addr_lock_nested() when
> building with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n and with W=1:
>
> include/linux/netdevice.h: In function 'netif_addr_lock_nested':
> include/linux/netdevice.h:2865:6: warning: variable 'subclass' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> int subclass = SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING;
> ^
>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Bart, could you please resend this patch with my acked-by?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists