lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407211747090.7042@chino.kir.corp.google.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:47:25 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_*(): Always evaluate second argument On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Evaluating a macro argument only if certain configuration options > have been selected is confusing and error-prone. Hence always > evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested() and > spin_lock_nest_lock(). > > This patch has the intentional side effect that it avoids that the > following warning is reported for netif_addr_lock_nested() when > building with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n and with W=1: > > include/linux/netdevice.h: In function 'netif_addr_lock_nested': > include/linux/netdevice.h:2865:6: warning: variable 'subclass' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] > int subclass = SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING; > ^ > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Bart, could you please resend this patch with my acked-by? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists