[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140722005104.GI12921@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:51:04 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH percpu/for-3.17 2/2] blk-throttle: replace custom async
percpu alloc mechanism with percpu_pool
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:08:34PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> From 0a4bd997ba9725565883c688d7dcee8264abf71c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:07:14 -0400
>
> throtl_pd_init() is called under the queue lock but needs to allocate
> the percpu stats area. This is currently handled by queueing it on a
> list and scheduling a work item to allocate and fill the percpu stats
> area. Now that perpcu_pool is available, this custom mechanism can be
> replaced.
>
> Add tg_stats_cpu_pool and implement tg_ensure_stats_cpu() which tries
> to make sure that tg->stats_cpu is populated to replace the custom
> async alloc mechanism. As percpu_pool allocation can fail,
> tg_ensure_stats_cpu() is invoked whenever ->stats_cpu is about to be
> accessed. This is similar to the way code was structured before as
> the custom async alloc could take arbitrary amount of time and each
> access should verify that ->stats_cpu is populated.
>
> This simplifies the code. There shouldn't be noticeable functional
> difference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Jens, can I route this patch through percpu tree?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists