Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:19:40 +0300
From:	Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@....com>
To:	Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>,
	Christian König 
	<deathsimple@...afone.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	John Bridgman <John.Bridgman@....com>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@...tes.org>,
	Andrew Lewycky <Andrew.Lewycky@....com>,
	Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@....com>,
	Ben Goz <Ben.Goz@....com>,
	Alexey Skidanov <Alexey.Skidanov@....com>,
	Evgeny Pinchuk <Evgeny.Pinchuk@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] AMDKFD kernel driver

On 22/07/14 10:28, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 03:03:07PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:41:29PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>>> On 21/07/14 21:22, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@....com> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm not sure whether we can do the same trick with the hw scheduler. But
>>>>>> then unpinning hw contexts will drain the pipeline anyway, so I guess we
>>>>>> can just stop feeding the hw scheduler until it runs dry. And then unpin
>>>>>> and evict.
>>>>> So, I'm afraid but we can't do this for AMD Kaveri because:
>>>>
>>>> Well as long as you can drain the hw scheduler queue (and you can do
>>>> that, worst case you have to unmap all the doorbells and other stuff
>>>> to intercept further submission from userspace) you can evict stuff.
>>>
>>> I can't drain the hw scheduler queue, as I can't do mid-wave preemption.
>>> Moreover, if I use the dequeue request register to preempt a queue
>>> during a dispatch it may be that some waves (wave groups actually) of
>>> the dispatch have not yet been created, and when I reactivate the mqd,
>>> they should be created but are not. However, this works fine if you use
>>> the HIQ. the CP ucode correctly saves and restores the state of an
>>> outstanding dispatch. I don't think we have access to the state from
>>> software at all, so it's not a bug, it is "as designed".
>>>
>>
>> I think here Daniel is suggesting to unmapp the doorbell page, and track
>> each write made by userspace to it and while unmapped wait for the gpu to
>> drain or use some kind of fence on a special queue. Once GPU is drain we
>> can move pinned buffer, then remap the doorbell and update it to the last
>> value written by userspace which will resume execution to the next job.
>
> Exactly, just prevent userspace from submitting more. And if you have
> misbehaving userspace that submits too much, reset the gpu and tell it
> that you're sorry but won't schedule any more work.

I'm not sure how you intend to know if a userspace misbehaves or not. Can you 
elaborate ?

	Oded
>
> We have this already in i915 (since like all other gpus we're not
> preempting right now) and it works. There's some code floating around to
> even restrict the reset to _just_ the offending submission context, with
> nothing else getting corrupted.
>
> You can do all this with the doorbells and unmapping them, but it's a
> pain. Much easier if you have a real ioctl, and I haven't seen anyone with
> perf data indicating that an ioctl would be too much overhead on linux.
> Neither in this thread nor internally here at intel.
> -Daniel
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists