[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140722094548.GP17528@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:45:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: tegra: roth: add display DT node
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:39:51PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> I also don't think that would do it - for many displays the power-on
> sequence is not as simple as "switch all the regulators on".
> Maybe what we would want is to have panel-simple allow panels to
> provide a "probe" callback so they can request and manage any extra
> resource they need. This would of course imply that custom
> enable/disable and suspend/resume callbacks. Then the driver might not
> be "simple" anymore, but IMHO it would not be that bad.
This is starting to mirror the discussion about MMC/SDIO devices where
the talk was of having a property on the device saying which power up
scheme to use - added Ulf for that.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists