[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140722084046.13355492@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:40:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] module: add within_module() function
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:28:09 +0200
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz> wrote:
> It is just a small optimization that allows to replace few
> occurrences of within_module_init() || within_module_core()
> with a single call.
This looks like a nice clean up. Rusty, what do you think?
-- Steve
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
> ---
> include/linux/module.h | 5 +++++
> kernel/module.c | 12 ++++--------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index f520a767c86c..61d8fb2d0873 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -408,6 +408,11 @@ static inline int within_module_init(unsigned long addr, const struct module *mo
> addr < (unsigned long)mod->module_init + mod->init_size;
> }
>
> +static inline int within_module(unsigned long addr, const struct module *mod)
> +{
> + return within_module_init(addr, mod) || within_module_core(addr, mod);
> +}
> +
> /* Search for module by name: must hold module_mutex. */
> struct module *find_module(const char *name);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index ae79ce615cb9..be0e479ccb5c 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3444,8 +3444,7 @@ const char *module_address_lookup(unsigned long addr,
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
> if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
> continue;
> - if (within_module_init(addr, mod) ||
> - within_module_core(addr, mod)) {
> + if (within_module(addr, mod)) {
> if (modname)
> *modname = mod->name;
> ret = get_ksymbol(mod, addr, size, offset);
> @@ -3469,8 +3468,7 @@ int lookup_module_symbol_name(unsigned long addr, char *symname)
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
> if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
> continue;
> - if (within_module_init(addr, mod) ||
> - within_module_core(addr, mod)) {
> + if (within_module(addr, mod)) {
> const char *sym;
>
> sym = get_ksymbol(mod, addr, NULL, NULL);
> @@ -3495,8 +3493,7 @@ int lookup_module_symbol_attrs(unsigned long addr, unsigned long *size,
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
> if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
> continue;
> - if (within_module_init(addr, mod) ||
> - within_module_core(addr, mod)) {
> + if (within_module(addr, mod)) {
> const char *sym;
>
> sym = get_ksymbol(mod, addr, size, offset);
> @@ -3760,8 +3757,7 @@ struct module *__module_address(unsigned long addr)
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
> if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
> continue;
> - if (within_module_core(addr, mod)
> - || within_module_init(addr, mod))
> + if (within_module(addr, mod))
> return mod;
> }
> return NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists