| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140722131832.GY8537@dragon>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:18:33 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
CC: <peter.chen@...escale.com>, <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
<b35083@...escale.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: dts: vf610: add USB PHY and controller
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:57:31AM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Am 2014-07-22 04:22, schrieb Shawn Guo:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 07:01:37PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> >> This adds USB PHY and USB controller nodes. Vybrid SoCs have two
> >> independent USB cores which each supports DR (dual role). However,
> >> real OTG is not supported since the OTG ID pin is not available.
> >>
> >> The PHYs are located within the anadig register range, hence we need
> >> to change the length of the anadig registers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi
> >> index 6a6190c..f6c3f02 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi
> >> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
> >> gpio2 = &gpio3;
> >> gpio3 = &gpio4;
> >> gpio4 = &gpio5;
> >> + usbphy0 = &usbphy0;
> >> + usbphy1 = &usbphy1;
> >> };
> >>
> >> cpus {
> >> @@ -285,9 +287,25 @@
> >> gpio-ranges = <&iomuxc 0 128 7>;
> >> };
> >>
> >> - anatop@...50000 {
> >> - compatible = "fsl,vf610-anatop";
> >> - reg = <0x40050000 0x1000>;
> >> + anatop: anatop@...50000 {
> >> + compatible = "fsl,vf610-anatop", "syscon";
> >> + reg = <0x40050000 0x400>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + usbphy0: usbphy@...50800 {
> >> + compatible = "fsl,vf610-usbphy", "fsl,imx23-usbphy";
> >
> > Since phy driver will match "fsl,vf610-usbphy" anyway, we do not need
> > "fsl,imx23-usbphy" here.
>
> <snip>
>
> >> @@ -309,6 +327,18 @@
> >> reg = <0x4006b000 0x1000>;
> >> #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> };
> >> +
> >> + usbdev0: usb@...34000 {
> >> + compatible = "fsl,imx6q-usb", "fsl,imx27-usb";
> >
> > It doesn't really make any sense to have "fsl,imx6q-usb" here. The
> > following one should be less confusing.
> >
> > compatible = "fsl,vf610-usb", "fsl,imx27-usb";
>
>
> I don't quite understand the rule here, when do we drop compatible you
> suggest in fsl,imx23-usbphy and when do we keep the "fallback" as we do
> for the USB controller?
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mxs-phy.txt says:
> > "fsl,imx23-usbphy" is still a fallback for other strings
As "fsl,vf610-usbphy" should be added into mxs-phy.txt as a new
compatible string, "fsl,imx23-usbphy" will not be the "fallback" of it,
so there is no point to have "fsl,imx23-usbphy" for vf610 usbphy.
>
> And Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-imx.txt says:
> > - compatible: Should be "fsl,imx27-usb"
The "fsl,imx27-usb" is the only compatible string defined by the
binding, and vf610 usb will also match it, so we need to have it in the
vf610 usb compatible string. "fsl,vf610-usb" is put there only for
saving DTB update in case someday vf610 usb needs a new programming
model and the binding needs to be extended to have "fsl,vf610-usb" as
a new compatible.
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists