lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:47:16 +0200
From:	Maarten Lankhorst <>
To:	Christian König <>,
	Christian König <>,
	Dave Airlie <>,
	Thomas Hellstrom <>,
	nouveau <>,
	LKML <>,
	dri-devel <>,
	Ben Skeggs <>,
	"Deucher, Alexander" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for

op 22-07-14 16:39, Christian König schreef:
> Am 22.07.2014 16:27, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>> op 22-07-14 16:24, Christian König schreef:
>>>> No, you really shouldn't be doing much in the check anyway, it's meant to be a lightweight check. If you're not ready yet because of a lockup simply return not signaled yet.
>>> It's not only the lockup case from radeon I have in mind here. For userspace queues it might be necessary to call copy_from_user to figure out if a fence is signaled or not.
>>> Returning false all the time is probably not a good idea either.
>> Having userspace implement a fence sounds like an awful idea, why would you want to do that?
> Marketing moves in mysterious ways. Don't ask me, but that the direction it currently moves with userspace queues and IOMMU etc...
>> A fence could be exported to userspace, but that would only mean it can wait for it to be signaled with an interface like poll..
> Yeah agree totally, but the point for the fence interface is that I can't predict what's necessary to check if a fence is signaled or not on future hardware.
> For the currently available radeon hardware I can say that reading a value from a kernel page is pretty much all you need. But for older hardware that was reading from a register which might become very tricky if the hardware is power off or currently inside a reset cycle.
> Because off this I would avoid any such interface if it's not absolutely required by some use case, and currently I don't see this requirement because the functionality you want to archive could be implemented without this.
Oh? I've already done that in radeon_fence, there is no way enable_signaling will fiddle with hardware registers during a reset cycle.
I've also made sure that __radeon_fence_is_signaled grabs exclusive_lock in read mode before touching any hw state.

Older hardware also doesn't implement optimus, so I think power off is not much of a worry for them, if you could point me at the checking done for that I could make sure that this is the case.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists