linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: more log flag simplification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53CE897F.4090308@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:55:43 -0500
From:	Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kay@...y.org, pmladek@...e.cz,
	john.stultz@...aro.org, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: more log flag simplification

On 07/22/2014 09:24 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 09:01:55AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>> This series eliminates the LOG_CONT entirely from the printk/log code.
>> It builds on another series, posted earlier today:
>>     http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1791665.html
>> This series was originally longer, but in review I was reminded
>> that some of the simplifications I had done were not valid.
>>
>> The first patch exploits the fact that LOG_CONT and LOG_NEWLINE
>> are inverses, and uses LOG_NEWLINE (or its negation) anywhere
>> LOG_CONT is used.  As a result, LOG_CONT is no longer needed, so
>> it's eliminated.
>>
>> The second patch improves some comments and makes a few small
>> code cleanups, now that it's gone through this transformation.
> 
> This is getting ridiculous - you've been spamming me with printk patches
> like crazy every day! I told you to wait a bit with a resend until
> people have had a chance to review them, but you don't seem to care.
> 
> Would you please remove me from your CC list?

Yes.	-Alex

> Thank you.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/