lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <53CDC9D7.5000803@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:17:59 +0900 From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jic23@...nel.org, ch.naveen@...sung.com, mark.rutland@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kgene.kim@...sung.com, pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, t.figa@...sung.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, galak@...eaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 0/4] iio: adc: exynos_adc: Support Exynos3250 ADC and code clean Hi Arnd, On 07/21/2014 05:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 21 July 2014 17:17:44 Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> On 07/21/2014 05:11 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> On 07/21/2014 04:38 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>> On Monday 21 July 2014 11:17:44 Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This patchset support Exynos3250 ADC (Analog Digital Converter) because >>>>> Exynos3250 has additional special clock for ADC IP. >>>>> >>>>> Changes from v6: >>>>> - Use "exynos3250-adc" compatible string instead of "exynos3250-adc-v2" >>>>> - Use "sclk" clock name instead of "sclk_adc" >>>>> - Remove un-necessary macro for exyno-adc-data-v2 structure. >>>>> - Remove '(void *)' cast and mark the exynos-adc-data structure as 'const' >>>>> - Change the number of ADC channels (Exynos3250 has only two channels for ADC) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Looks good to me. Two small requests: >>>> >>>> a) if you don't mind, can you add my patch (1/2) to add support for s3c64xx to >>>> your series, adding your Signed-off-by line in addition to mine? I think >>>> that one was noncontroversial, while the second patch (2/2) need some more >>>> work to address the comments and do testing. >>> >>> OK, I'll add this patch. >>> But, I have a question. >>> >>> Your patch add following compatible string. >>> "s3c64100-adc" is right? >>> >>> static const struct of_device_id exynos_adc_match[] = { >>> { >>> + .compatible = "samsung,s3c64100-adc", >>> + .data = &exynos_adc_s3c64xx_data, >>> + }, { >> >> Additionally, >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/exynos-adc.txt has not included >> "samsung,s3c6410-adc" compatible string. Should I add this string in exynos-adc.txt? >> >> drivers/iio/adc/exynos-adc.c has not includeded following compatible string. >> Should I add this compatible string on exynos-adc.c? >> >> + Must be "samsung,s3c2410-adc" for >> + the ADC in s3c2410 and compatibles >> + Must be "samsung,s3c2416-adc" for >> + the ADC in s3c2416 and compatibles >> + Must be "samsung,s3c2440-adc" for >> + the ADC in s3c2440 and compatibles >> + Must be "samsung,s3c2440-adc" for >> + the ADC in s3c2440 and compatibles >> + Must be "samsung,s3c2443-adc" for >> + the ADC in s3c2443 and compatibles >> > > > Yes, please. I send following patchset[1] to support s3c24xx/s3c64xx ADC. [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1791305.html Thanks, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists