lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140722162940.GH3935@laptop> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:29:40 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] sched_clock: Track monotonic raw clock On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:17:23PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > > Now, I already mentioned max error bounds, and I've not yet looked at > > your actual control loop, but that is something to keep in mind, we want > > something that's limited. > > Indeed. Richard has already expressed concerns that my coefficients > won't work everywhere (as in with different clock rate ratios) and he's > most likely right. My money is on a more advanced, "self-tuning" > solution, where we definitely need an escape condition. I was wanting to look up software PLLs, as I seem to remember that's what NTP and PTP use, but Richard should know I think. Its not really a subject I've looked at before. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists