[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140722162940.GH3935@laptop>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:29:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched_clock: Track monotonic raw clock
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:17:23PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > Now, I already mentioned max error bounds, and I've not yet looked at
> > your actual control loop, but that is something to keep in mind, we want
> > something that's limited.
>
> Indeed. Richard has already expressed concerns that my coefficients
> won't work everywhere (as in with different clock rate ratios) and he's
> most likely right. My money is on a more advanced, "self-tuning"
> solution, where we definitely need an escape condition.
I was wanting to look up software PLLs, as I seem to remember that's
what NTP and PTP use, but Richard should know I think.
Its not really a subject I've looked at before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists