linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] pcie: Add Xilinx PCIe Host Bridge IP driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc252e61-3179-4f51-90e6-f92929e93d40@BN1AFFO11FD030.protection.gbl>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:02:08 +0200
From:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Srikanth Thokala <sthokal@...inx.com>
CC:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pcie: Add Xilinx PCIe Host Bridge IP driver

On 07/22/2014 06:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Srikanth Thokala <sthokal@...inx.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I see I forgot to ask for a MAINTAINERS entry for this driver.  Can
>>> you add one?
>>
>> There was a discussion on this earlier and Michal mentioned it is not
>> required as it is
>> handled by our Xilinx record.
>>
>> Here is the reply from Michal to the MAINTAINERS update comment,
>>
>> < Reply from Michal >
>>
>>> Please also include a MAINTAINERS update for drivers/pci/host/pci-xilinx.c.
>>
>> This should be handle by our record that's why MAINTAINERS update is
>> not necessary.
>> (N: xilinx below)
> 
> That's technically true in the sense that get_maintainer.pl will do
> the right thing, but I often review patches in email (without
> extracting them), so it's more convenient to just look in MAINTAINERS
> to see if they have the right acks.  But I guess I can deal with it
> either way.

There is also another reason for using just this fragment.
Because developers and their responsibilities are changing so often
and I just know who is responsible for it at that time.

Thanks,
Michal


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/