[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53CE9C5F.1030005@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:16:15 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] clk: tegra: don't abort clk init on error
On 07/15/2014 09:24 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Just continue initializing clocks if there's an error on one of them. This
> is useful if there's a mistake in the inittable, because the system could
> hang if clk_disable_unused() disables some of the critical clocks in this
> table.
If there's a problem in the init table, we should simply fix it instead
of working around it.
At the very least, we need to WARN on this rather than just ignoring
problems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists