[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6456081.JRV4vu9CHq@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:24:23 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ARM: brcmstb: Add Broadcom STB SoC support
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 17:33:50 Matt Porter wrote:
>
> > > For the reset of mach-bcm stuff, I'll just send an arm-soc pull request
> > > soon enough, unless Matt/Arnd/Olof object.
> >
> > I'll wait for Matt to comment before pulling it, otherwise that sounds
> > fine.
>
> I'm fine with it, but we were asked to have one request for bcm5301x to
> make life easy for the arm-soc team. If we want each platform to do pull
> requests directly with arm-soc we should advise Hauke to do the same as
> well with bcm5301x. I think the chances of Kconfig/Makefile conflicts are
> relatively low as there's a dwindling amount of code of interest in new
> platform mach directories like ours.
>
> I would like to see a consistent path for all BCM platform maintainers.
>
Ok. Brian, please send the pull request or patches to Matt then.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists