lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1406067727-19683-22-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:20:32 -0700 From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com> Subject: [PATCH 3.8 021/116] HID: core: fix validation of report id 0 3.8.13.27 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> commit 1b15d2e5b8077670b1e6a33250a0d9577efff4a5 upstream. Some drivers use the first HID report in the list instead of using an index. In these cases, validation uses ID 0, which was supposed to mean "first known report". This fixes the problem, which was causing at least the lgff family of devices to stop working since hid_validate_values was being called with ID 0, but the devices used single numbered IDs for their reports: 0x05, 0x01, /* Usage Page (Desktop), */ 0x09, 0x05, /* Usage (Gamepad), */ 0xA1, 0x01, /* Collection (Application), */ 0xA1, 0x02, /* Collection (Logical), */ 0x85, 0x01, /* Report ID (1), */ ... Reported-by: Simon Wood <simon@...gewell.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com> --- drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c index 14744e0..8ad2505 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c @@ -797,7 +797,17 @@ struct hid_report *hid_validate_values(struct hid_device *hid, * ->numbered being checked, which may not always be the case when * drivers go to access report values. */ - report = hid->report_enum[type].report_id_hash[id]; + if (id == 0) { + /* + * Validating on id 0 means we should examine the first + * report in the list. + */ + report = list_entry( + hid->report_enum[type].report_list.next, + struct hid_report, list); + } else { + report = hid->report_enum[type].report_id_hash[id]; + } if (!report) { hid_err(hid, "missing %s %u\n", hid_report_names[type], id); return NULL; -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists