lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:21:40 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Random panic in load_balance() with 3.16-rc

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net> wrote:
>
> Just happened again with the same change on top of 3.16-rc6.

The (maybe) related bugzilla entry is just odd. Bruno Wolff reports
that the BUG_ON() in his added patch triggers:

+               cpumask_clear(sched_group_cpus(sg));
+               sg->sgc->capacity = 0;
+               BUG_ON(!cpumask_empty(sched_group_cpus(sg)));

where it *just* did a cpumask_clear(), and now the BUG_ON() triggers
that it's no longer empty?

That would imply an allocation error, but all the sched groups seem to
be properly allocated with the proper addition of cpumask_size().

And his config file even has NR_CPUS being 32, so it should be a
single word of bitmap, which triggers all the simple code.

Completely insane, in other words.

           Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ