[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1406091303.5076.33.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:55:03 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 09:42 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> FWIW the main problem is currently that switch-through-idle is so
> slow. I think improving that would give a boost to far more
> situations.
Two high frequency idle enter/exit suckage spots:
1) nohz (tick) - it's expensive to start/stop tick on every micro-idle,
throttle it or something.
2) ondemand governor - tweak silly default settings to reflect the
reality that we routinely schedule communicating threads cross core.
(3. seek/destroy fastpath cycles, damn things multiply over time)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists