[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFu+oWYiKJsaqt6Gc3mzJqSReZpd4m-iJbvuoUGARdyr4xA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:41:23 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpiolib: Export gpiochip_request_own_desc and gpiochip_free_own_desc
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> Both functions were introduced to let gpio drivers request their own
> gpio pins. Without exporting the functions, this can however only be
> used by gpio drivers built into the kernel.
>
> Secondary impact is that the functions can not currently be used by
> platform initialization code associated with the gpio-pca953x driver.
> This code permits auto-export of gpio pins through platform data, but
> if this functionality is used, the module can no longer be unloaded due
> to the problem solved with the introduction of gpiochip_request_own_desc
> and gpiochip_free_own_desc.
>
> Export both function so they can be used from modules and from
> platform initialization code.
>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Makes sense to have them there.
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists