[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53CF159C.8040102@greenwavereality.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:53:32 -0700
From: Bob Richmond <robert.richmond@...enwavereality.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Adding neighbor cache entry solely initiated by multicast traffic
For a device on the local network that mostly functions as a multicast
receiver, the only packets a router may see from this client are IGMP
membership reports. I believe that alone should be enough information to
establish a neighbor cache entry for it.
A client intending to unicast to the router will first ARP for the
router's address, and the router will then respond to the ARP AND cache
the client's address to avoid ARPing for the client's address when
replying to original packet.
I believe this patch functions in the same spirit of that approach.
Something like this is necessary for a router managing multicast
subscriptions in userspace using the ipmr API. Such a thing would need
to know which interface an IGMP membership report came in on, in order
to establish a vif route for it. Without a netlink message indicating a
new neighbor for the subscriber's IP address, it can't be known which
vif to establish the route on.
Is there anything glaringly wrong with this?
View attachment "linux-3.4.91_add_neighbour_on_multicast.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1700 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists