[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140723120907.GG11241@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:09:07 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] rcu: Remove redundant check for an online CPU
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:09:41AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> rcu_prcess_callbacks() is the softirq handler for RCU which is raised from
> invoke_rcu_core() which is called from __call_rcu_core().
>
> Each of these three functions checks if the cpu is online. We can remove the
> redundant ones. This commit removes one of these redundant check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Sorry, but no. There can be a long delay between raise_softirq() and
this function starting, particularly if ksoftirqd gets involved. The
CPU could easily go offline in the meantime.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 72e0b1f..044946e 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2563,8 +2563,6 @@ static void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused)
> {
> struct rcu_state *rsp;
>
> - if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
> - return;
> trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start RCU core"));
> for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> __rcu_process_callbacks(rsp);
> --
> 2.0.0.rc2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists