[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140723135009.GA21707@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:50:09 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
paulus@...ba.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
hpa@...or.com, jkosina@...e.cz, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, fweisbec@...il.com, cl@...ux.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
JBottomley@...allels.com, neilb@...e.de,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, rric@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mhocko@...e.cz, david@...morbit.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/70] cpu: Restructure FROZEN state handling
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 09:58:37PM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> There are only a few callbacks which really care about FROZEN
> vs. !FROZEN. No need to have extra states for this.
>
> Publish the frozen state in an extra variable which is updated under
> the hotplug lock and let the users interested deal with it w/o
> imposing that extra state checks on everyone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists