[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53CFC170.9090505@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:06:40 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, geert@...ux-m68k.org
CC: rostedt@...dmis.org, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
xerofoify@...il.com, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/q40: Revert "m68k/q40: Fix q40_irq_startup() to
return -ENXIO on failures"
On 07/23/2014 05:51 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Revert since we're trying to return -ENXIO from a function returning
> unsigned int. Not only it causes compiler warnings it's also obviously
> incorrect.
>
> In general, watch for patches from Nick Krause since they are not even
> build tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Guess I wasn't fast enough with my comments :-(
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
> index 9dfa1ea..513f9bb 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
> +++ b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static unsigned int q40_irq_startup(struct irq_data *data)
> case 1: case 2: case 8: case 9:
> case 11: case 12: case 13:
> printk("%s: ISA IRQ %d not implemented by HW\n", __func__, irq);
> - return -ENXIO;
> + /* FIXME return -ENXIO; */
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists