[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140723153125.GA520@sucs.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:31:25 +0100
From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
ohering@...e.com, apw@...onical.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
jbottomley@...allels.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Add blist flags
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 07:10:14AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:54:43PM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > That's good to know (I was worried the device would not be detected as
> > supporting discard because it doesn't report lbpme and doesn't declare a
> > conformance version (see below)).
>
> Ok, that makes things worse - you might be able to force it through
> sysfs, though.
I've got a hack that seems to be working for me - see below.
> > Is there a tree with all these updates
> > in or do they need to be pieced together from this email thread?
>
> I'm picking this up for my scsi-queue tree. Still need a review
> for the patch we're replying to before that one can go in, though.
OK.
> > Additionally is it worth quirking sd_try_rc16_first on when
> > BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES is present?
>
> Sounds reasonable to me.
OK did you want me to post a set of changes to your patch? I've
basically changed the patches from bypassing the SCSI level check (to
allow scanning of VPD pages) to also try READ_CAPACITY(16) first and
bypass lbpme checks. Now it's more of a case of BLIST_TRY_LBP...
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists