linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] edac: Remove fixmes in e7xxx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDOMVh+zVQZQWjS1mTDmZo9frvk9t+kzN4_cOaoDgaNePF2AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:35:21 -0400
From:	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Levente Kurusa <lkurusa@...hat.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>,
	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"m.chehab@...sung.com" <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: Remove fixmes in e7xxx_edac.c

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:56:06 -0400
> Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:25:24PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I understand what your saying and I should have searched for Page shift.
>> >> In addition I am already got commits in the kernel for fix mes so I feel
>> >> that your comment on fix mes is incorrect.
>> >
>> > After seeing your other solutions to "fix mes" around the kernel, I now have to
>> > investigate the patches that were accepted, and see if they did not cause
>> > any new bugs. If any of them do, I will ask to have all your patches reverted.
>> >
>> > You are not helping. You are actually doing quite the opposite. Who do you work
>> > for? Microsoft or Apple?
>> >
>> > -- Steve
>> >
>>
>> I don't work for any companies. And here is one of them that has been accepted.
>> I am removing two fix mes in this file as after dicussing then it  seems
>> there is no reason to check against Null for usb_device as it can never
>> be NULL and this is check is therefore not needed.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=140612440420712&w=2
>
> And your patches seem to be getting reverted. Wow, I think you broke a
> new record in having the percentage of patches added to the kernel and
> then reverted. Even before they made it to mainline.
>
> You may be the only developer that has all their commits reverted
> before they ever make it into the mainline tree!
>
> Congratulations! I think it is wise now for all maintainers to add your
> email to their /dev/null folder. It will help them from wasting any
> more of their precious time on you.
>
> -- Steve
Steve, I  have make a few mistakes. That doesn't give you the right to
put me under a waste of time yet.
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/