[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140723182548.GE3935@laptop>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:25:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Random panic in load_balance() with 3.16-rc
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:15:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:54:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >> So the length is fine, and the disassembly shows that it is fixed (16
> >> 32-bit words - why the heck does it use "movsl" rather than "movsq",
> >> whatever).
> >
> > Which is exactly right btw, he's got CONFIG_NR_CPUS=512 and 8*4*16=512.
>
> That's not my point. Why the f*ck does it use "movsl", when "movsq"
> should work as well or better.
Agreed, big question there. I was merely pointing out that the value is
consistent with his .config.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists