[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140723183332.GA21992@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:33:32 -0500
From: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] fs: dlm: lockd: Convert int result to unsigned char
type
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:11:39PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:23:43 -0700
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> > op->info.rv is an s32, but it's only used as a u8.
> >
>
> I don't understand this patch. info.rv is s32 (and I assume that "rv"
> stands for "return value"). What I don't get is why you think it's just
> used as a u8. It seems to be used more like a bool than anything else,
Thank you, Jeff.
/* info.rv from userspace is 1 for conflict, 0 for no-conflict,
-ENOENT if there are no locks on the file */
rv = op->info.rv;
> and I'm not sure that "type" is really a good description for it. Maybe
> it should be a "bool" and named "conflict", given the comments in
> dlm_posix_get ?
type is not a good name.
Sorry Joe, I'm not a fan of your patches.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists