[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140723193444.GA30194@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:34:44 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: kill the dead code in trace_sched_switch.c
On 07/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> This motivated me to try to find something else unused. And it seems that
> almost all code in kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c is dead? Hmm, and
> probably even event_context_switch... I'll recheck and send the patch.
No, event_context_switch can't simply go away. But afaics the only user
is tracing_sched_switch_trace(), and the only caller of this function is
probe_wakeup_sched_switch(). Looks a bit strange.
After this patch we should probably move tracing_sched_switch_trace() and
tracing_sched_wakeup_trace() from trace_sched_switch.c to trace_sched_wakeup.c
and make them static. And perhaps we can also move the rest of this
code somewhere else and rm this file...
Oleg.
kernel/trace/trace.h | 3 -
kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c | 88 -------------------------------------
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists