lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140723135714.54b97f8184ae69ba9fb32228@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:57:14 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: fs: use after free in /proc/pid/mountinfo

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:01:34 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote:
> 
> > I've been running mainline for a while, and while I can reproduce a different
> > bug for Hugh, I can't reproduce this one at all. Not sure how to call it now,
> > maybe memory corruption from somewhere else (I did find an unrelated memory
> > corruption couple days ago)?
> > 
> 
> I have a very large /proc/pid/mountinfo on one of my busy systems with VM 
> and slub debugging enabled and have not been able to reproduce the issue 
> while reading it in a loop for 24 hours.  I would call the patch good on 
> that basis, but it's very strange you'd report this problem a day after 
> the patch was merged and could not reproduce it once it was reverted.  
> (Unless the patch was misapplied locally and reapplying it now worked, but 
> I doubt you originally merged -mm patches into a local tree yourself.)

I was going to revert "fs/seq_file: fallback to vmalloc allocation" but
the idea of doing that is so lame and pathetic that I think I'll not do
that.  If we have a bug then let's just find and fix it when someone is
able to trigger it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ