[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D02F7B.5020309@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:56:11 -0700
From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
David Riley <davidriley@...omium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ritesh Harjain <ritesh.harjani@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] common: dma-mapping: Introduce common remapping
functions
On 7/23/2014 3:45 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:35:06AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -298,37 +298,19 @@ static void *
>> __dma_alloc_remap(struct page *page, size_t size, gfp_t gfp, pgprot_t prot,
>> const void *caller)
>> {
>> - struct vm_struct *area;
>> - unsigned long addr;
>> -
>> /*
>> * DMA allocation can be mapped to user space, so lets
>> * set VM_USERMAP flags too.
>> */
>> - area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
>> - caller);
>> - if (!area)
>> - return NULL;
>> - addr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
>> - area->phys_addr = __pfn_to_phys(page_to_pfn(page));
>> -
>> - if (ioremap_page_range(addr, addr + size, area->phys_addr, prot)) {
>> - vunmap((void *)addr);
>> - return NULL;
>> - }
>> - return (void *)addr;
>> + return dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, size,
>> + VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
>> + prot, caller);
>
> I think we still need at least a comment in the commit log since the arm
> code is moving from ioremap_page_range() to map_vm_area(). There is a
> slight performance penalty with the addition of a kmalloc() on this
> path.
>
> Or even better (IMO), see below.
>
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c
> [...]
>> +void *dma_common_contiguous_remap(struct page *page, size_t size,
>> + unsigned long vm_flags,
>> + pgprot_t prot, const void *caller)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct page **pages;
>> + void *ptr;
>> +
>> + pages = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << get_order(size), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pages)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < (size >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++)
>> + pages[i] = page + i;
>> +
>> + ptr = dma_common_pages_remap(pages, size, vm_flags, prot, caller);
>> +
>> + kfree(pages);
>> +
>> + return ptr;
>> +}
>
> You could avoid the dma_common_page_remap() here (and kmalloc) and
> simply use ioremap_page_range(). We know that
> dma_common_contiguous_remap() is only called with contiguous physical
> range, so ioremap_page_range() is suitable. It also makes it a
> non-functional change for arch/arm.
>
My original thought with using map_vm_area vs. ioremap_page_range was
that ioremap_page_range is really intended for mapping io devices and
the like into the kernel virtual address space. map_vm_area is designed
to handle pages of kernel managed memory. Perhaps it's too nit-picky
a distinction though.
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists