[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140723.151252.513994964059108010.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jasowang@...hat.com
Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] rx busy polling support for virtio-net
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:33:53 +0800
> This series introduces the support for rx busy polling support. This
> was useful for reduing the latency for a kvm guest. Instead of
> introducing new states and spinlocks, this series re-uses NAPI state
> to synchonrize between NAPI and busy polling. This grealy simplified
> the codes and reduce the overheads of spinlocks for normal NAPI fast
> path.
>
> Test was done between a kvm guest and an external host. Two hosts were
> connected through 40gb mlx4 cards. With both busy_poll and busy_read
> are set to 50 in guest, 1 byte netperf tcp_rr shows 127% improvement:
> transaction rate was increased from 8353.33 to 18966.87.
>
> Changes from V2:
> - Avoid introducing new states and spinlocks by reusuing the NAPI
> state
> - Fix the budget calculation in virtnet_poll()
> - Drop patch 1/3 from V2 since it was useless
>
> Changes from V1:
> - split the patch info smaller ones
> - add more details about test setup/configuration
Series applied, thanks Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists