[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1406158393.13064.1.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 01:33:13 +0200
From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [BUG?] 3.16-rc6 ... at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:5997
intel_display_power_put+0x12d/0x160()
Try four, now including CC lists for the intel driver...
---
Hi again,
Playing some more with the new kernel release i noticed this:
[ 9064.008821] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 22929 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:5997 intel_display_power_put+0x12d/0x160()
[ 9064.008822] Modules linked in: uas bnep b43 mac80211 cfg80211 snd_hda_codec_hdmi btusb bluetooth 6lowpan_iphc rfkill snd_hda_codec_cirrus uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_generic videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_core snd_hda_intel snd_hda_controller snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_timer sdhci_pci snd sdhci soundcore mmc_core bcma
[ 9064.008839] CPU: 3 PID: 22929 Comm: kworker/3:2 Tainted: G W 3.16.0-rc6 #23
[ 9064.008840] Hardware name: Apple Inc. MacBookPro10,2/Mac-AFD8A9D944EA4843, BIOS MBP102.88Z.0106.B03.1211161133 11/16/2012
[ 9064.008843] Workqueue: events edp_panel_vdd_work
[ 9064.008844] 0000000000000009 ffff88015ba77d28 ffffffff8198ea2d 0000000000000000
[ 9064.008846] ffff88015ba77d60 ffffffff810cbac8 ffff8802610b002c 00000000000c7204
[ 9064.008848] 0000000000000001 ffff8802610b80f0 ffff8802610b0000 ffff88015ba77d70
[ 9064.008850] Call Trace:
[ 9064.008854] [<ffffffff8198ea2d>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a
[ 9064.008857] [<ffffffff810cbac8>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xa0
[ 9064.008858] [<ffffffff810cbba5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
[ 9064.008860] [<ffffffff815bdb3d>] intel_display_power_put+0x12d/0x160
[ 9064.008862] [<ffffffff8161e084>] edp_panel_vdd_off_sync+0xf4/0x1c0
[ 9064.008863] [<ffffffff8161e17f>] edp_panel_vdd_work+0x2f/0x40
[ 9064.008866] [<ffffffff810e63be>] process_one_work+0x16e/0x480
[ 9064.008868] [<ffffffff810e6cbb>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x520
[ 9064.008870] [<ffffffff810e6ba0>] ? create_and_start_worker+0x50/0x50
[ 9064.008872] [<ffffffff810ecb24>] kthread+0xc4/0xe0
[ 9064.008874] [<ffffffff810eca60>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
[ 9064.008877] [<ffffffff81997e6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 9064.008878] [<ffffffff810eca60>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
[ 9064.008880] ---[ end trace 17f9738f20aec288 ]---
----
I had multiples of them in my dmesg, however, this seems to fix it:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 8a1a4fb..4c3249d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1252,6 +1252,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
intel_dp->last_power_cycle = jiffies;
power_domain = intel_display_port_power_domain(intel_encoder);
+ intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, power_domain);
intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain);
}
}
@@ -1371,6 +1372,7 @@ void intel_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
/* We got a reference when we enabled the VDD. */
power_domain = intel_display_port_power_domain(intel_encoder);
+ intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, power_domain);
intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain);
}
---
The question however is: Is this the correct approach? Should it be done
differently?
(This handles the "close and open lid" usecase, i don't know if there
are others, a grep indicated that there might be two more missing...)
View attachment "intel_pm.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3397 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists