lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhHMCB2P1c25XXTHTYecvdO+oZbtVLDuo6Vpp+r=0uoFT3HQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:43:12 -0400
From:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To:	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] Eliminate redundant
 rcu_sysidle_state variable

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Now that we have rcu_state_p, which references rcu_preempt_state for
> TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and rcu_sched_state for TREE_RCU, we don't need a
> separate rcu_sysidle_state variable.  This commit therefore eliminates
> rcu_preempt_state in favor of rcu_state_p.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>

Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>


> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 24f5bd54ca9b..e31fa71c4d3a 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2662,16 +2662,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
>
> -/*
> - * Define RCU flavor that holds sysidle state.  This needs to be the
> - * most active flavor of RCU.
> - */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> -static struct rcu_state *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_preempt_state;
> -#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -static struct rcu_state *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_sched_state;
> -#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -
>  static int full_sysidle_state;         /* Current system-idle state. */
>  #define RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT                0       /* Some CPU is not idle. */
>  #define RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT      1       /* All CPUs idle for brief period. */
> @@ -2813,7 +2803,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
>          * not the flavor of RCU that tracks sysidle state, or if this
>          * is an offline or the timekeeping CPU, nothing to do.
>          */
> -       if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_sysidle_state ||
> +       if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_state_p ||
>             cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) || rdp->cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu)
>                 return;
>         if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rdp->rsp))
> @@ -2839,7 +2829,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
>   */
>  static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  {
> -       return rsp == rcu_sysidle_state;
> +       return rsp == rcu_state_p;
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -2917,7 +2907,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_cancel(void)
>  static void rcu_sysidle_report(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
>                                unsigned long maxj, bool gpkt)
>  {
> -       if (rsp != rcu_sysidle_state)
> +       if (rsp != rcu_state_p)
>                 return;  /* Wrong flavor, ignore. */
>         if (gpkt && nr_cpu_ids <= CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL)
>                 return;  /* Running state machine from timekeeping CPU. */
> @@ -2986,13 +2976,12 @@ bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void)
>
>                         /* Scan all the CPUs looking for nonidle CPUs. */
>                         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -                               rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_sysidle_state->rda, cpu);
> +                               rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state_p->rda, cpu);
>                                 rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(rdp, &isidle, &maxj);
>                                 if (!isidle)
>                                         break;
>                         }
> -                       rcu_sysidle_report(rcu_sysidle_state,
> -                                          isidle, maxj, false);
> +                       rcu_sysidle_report(rcu_state_p, isidle, maxj, false);
>                         oldrss = rss;
>                         rss = ACCESS_ONCE(full_sysidle_state);
>                 }
> @@ -3019,7 +3008,7 @@ bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void)
>          * provided by the memory allocator.
>          */
>         if (nr_cpu_ids > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL &&
> -           !rcu_gp_in_progress(rcu_sysidle_state) &&
> +           !rcu_gp_in_progress(rcu_state_p) &&
>             !rsh.inuse && xchg(&rsh.inuse, 1) == 0)
>                 call_rcu(&rsh.rh, rcu_sysidle_cb);
>         return false;
>



-- 
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ