[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E0BE1322F2F2246BD820DA9FC397ADE01703006@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:49:43 +0000
From: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 09/10] x86, mpx: cleanup unused bound tables
On 2014-07-24, Hansen, Dave wrote:
> On 07/20/2014 10:38 PM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>> Since the kernel allocated those tables on-demand without userspace
>> knowledge, it is also responsible for freeing them when the
>> associated mappings go away.
>>
>> Here, the solution for this issue is to hook do_munmap() to check
>> whether one process is MPX enabled. If yes, those bounds tables
>> covered in the virtual address region which is being unmapped will
>> be freed
> also.
>
> This is the part of the code that I'm the most concerned about.
>
> Could you elaborate on how you've tested this to make sure it works OK?
I can check a lot of debug information when one VMA and related bounds tables are allocated and freed through adding a lot of print() like log into kernel/runtime. Do you think this is enough?
Thanks,
Qiaowei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists