[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca2398ca40725bf3b1b258ab3707970e.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:12:13 -0000
From: skannan@...eaurora.org
To: "Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Saravana Kannan" <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Todd Poynor" <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on
hotplug/suspend
Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 July 2014 08:32, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Ok, I think I've figured this out. But one question. Is it possible to
>> physically remove one CPU in a bunch of "related cpus" without also
>> unplugging the rest? Put another way, can you unplug one core from a
>> cluster?
>
> Are we talking about doing this here:
>
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online ??
>
> If yes, then what's the confusion all about? Yes we do it all the time.
>
No. That's why I said physically remove.
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists