| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:12:13 -0000 From: skannan@...eaurora.org To: "Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: "Saravana Kannan" <skannan@...eaurora.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, "Todd Poynor" <toddpoynor@...gle.com>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24 July 2014 08:32, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote: >> Ok, I think I've figured this out. But one question. Is it possible to >> physically remove one CPU in a bunch of "related cpus" without also >> unplugging the rest? Put another way, can you unplug one core from a >> cluster? > > Are we talking about doing this here: > > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online ?? > > If yes, then what's the confusion all about? Yes we do it all the time. > No. That's why I said physically remove. -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists