[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1406198202.20036.17.camel@x220>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:36:42 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/28] phy: miphy365x: Provide support for the MiPHY356x
Generic PHY
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 16:26 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> The MiPHY365x is a Generic PHY which can serve various SATA or PCIe
> devices. It has 2 ports which it can use for either; both SATA, both
> PCIe or one of each in any configuration.
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> ---
This patch landed in today's linux-next (ie, next-20140724).
>[...]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,616 @@
>[...]
> +
> +#define PLL_CTRL1_REG 0x50
> +#define PLL_START_CAL BIT(0)
> +#define BUF_EN BIT(2)
> +#define SYNCHRO_TX BIT(3)
> +#define SSC_EN BIT(6)
> +#define CONFIG_PLL BIT(7)
This is probably a pet peeve very few people share, but anyway: would it
be possible to not use the CONFIG_ prefix here? Ie, to use, say, CONF_
or CFG_ instead.
I know there are quite a few preprocessor defines for macros starting
with CONFIG_ already. And I realize CONFIG_ is rather generic. But that
is what the build system uses so I do think it would preferable to try
to use it only for actual Kconfig macros.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists