[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140724151628.GH13371@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:16:28 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] arm64: Add seccomp support
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:00:03PM +0100, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2014 10:40 PM, "AKASHI Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org> wrote:
> > when I implemented audit for arm64, the assumptions were
> > * If userspace is LE, then the kernel is also LE and if BE, then the kernel is BE.
> > * the syscall numbers and how arguments are encoded are the same btw BE and LE.
> > So syscall_get_arch() always return the same value.
>
> If arm64 ever adds support for mixed-endian userspace, this could
> become awkward. Hmm.
I really doubt we would ever support mixed endian user space. Too many
problems with translating syscalls, futexes (someone looked into this
and gave up eventually).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists