linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] [SCSI] Make LBP quirk skip lbpme checks tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140724153419.GA10372@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:34:19 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	ohering@...e.com, apw@...onical.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
	jbottomley@...allels.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] [SCSI] Make LBP quirk skip lbpme checks tests

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:54:24AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> I'm very much against short-circuiting the LBP logic in a passthrough
> driver because then we might end up in the exact situation we were
> trying to avoid with this patch series. Namely sending down commands
> unsupported by the target device.
> 
> This kind of thing really needs to be a sysadmin decision and can be
> handled with a udev rule.

I agree - I'd like to pull in KY's simple fix as soon as I get a second
review for it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/