linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - simplify mxt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53D128C1.9020707@itdev.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:39:45 +0100
From:	Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Yufeng Shen <miletus@...omium.org>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
	Iiro Valkonen <iiro.valkonen@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - simplify mxt_initialize a bit

On 23/07/14 22:50, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> I think having control flow with 2 goto/labels/flags is quite hard to read,
> this version is a bit more readable IMO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>

Yes, this looks much clearer to me. Although I can't see anything wrong
looking at it, I think I should probably regression test it for the
different failure paths before it is applied, I will bring it into my series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/